Saturday, January 12, 2013

Rules of the Game

One of the side-stories of last week's National Championship football game was the attention attracted by Alabama quarterback A.J. McCarron's girlfriend, Katherine Webb.  Miss Webb - a former Miss Alabama - instantly became a top search on the internet and attracted a massive number of followers on Twitter.

Here in the UAE, Twitter has also been lighting up over the presence of women at sporting events.  This time it's over Emirati women attending football (soccer) matches as fans.  While Emirati women have a considerable amount of freedom here inside the UAE - sporting events are still considered pretty much male-only territory.  I'll post a recent article in its entirety from the newspaper, The National, for you to read.  If you would like to visit the newspaper's website, the story is here, with another follow-up piece here

Social media erupted with hundreds of comments from Emiratis supporting or criticising as many 25 women who were scheduled to fly to Bahrain on Tuesday to see the UAE's Gulf Cup match with the host country.
Nasreen Ali Darwish, the president of the Women's Committee of the UAE Cycling Federation, approached the Football Association (FA) about Emirati women attending the game, and the FA reserved room for 25 among the six flights departing the country yesterday for the game at Manama on Tuesday night, as well as for 25 chaperones.

The Arabic-language discussion began trending almost immediately, with the hashtag that translates, from a two-word Arabic phrase, to "women supporters of the national team".

"If I had time I would take my kids and go, and if you don't like it, it's not my problem," tweeted the user @nailaalnuaimi.

"If the woman is escorted by her father or brother and will be seated in a family specified area, I see nothing wrong with that."

The user said, "It's personal, as long as there is decency. At the end these women are representing the UAE population."

However, the majority of Twitter users seemed opposed to the idea, which represented a first: UAE women travelling to a national football match outside the country. User: "I'm not against equality, but this is something against our traditions and culture. Don't run blindly behind what you think is 'development'."

One user said, "It is sad to see the UAEFA encourages women to unveil and discard their decency under the flag of supportiveness." User @wafa_als suggested it was silly for women to attend a match. "If she wants to support she can do it from home," she wrote.

@Bnshaheen1 tweeted that it was the fault of the parents and guardians for allowing their daughters, sisters or wives to go to such venues. Agreeing with him was @bomoath75, who feared women at a match would "lose the spirit of modesty and chastity".

The user "I know that we had women present at the stadium back in Gulf Cup 18, but they were in their own country. Who knows what can happen to them if they travel alone to another country?"

User @jumaira_ tweeted that this idea was "foreign and alien to what we are used to and will distort the image of our country".

Monday, January 7, 2013

It's all about Perspective

by Cindy

One of the courses I teach at the university is project management.  I love the end of the semester when students present their projects.  It always amazes me the assumptions they make and the conclusions they draw.  I pick up on numerous cultural differences.  For example:

One project was to open a day care.  Their justification?  Maids are abusing the kids and not taking good care of the kids.  The underlying assumption here is that if you have a child(ren) then you also have a maid.  And some maids do a terrible job.  There's never really even a consideration that you might raise your child(ren) on your own, without a maid.

As for the funding of almost every project?  The UAE government will provide the money through "loans" that do not have to be paid back or the Sheikh donates the money.

During the Q and A time for one project, a student in the audience asked how the proposed day care planned to make money so it could survive.  The answer?  We don't make money each year, we plan the daycare as a "social responsibility need."

Another project was issuing bonuses to their employees.  You were eligible for a bonus based on how long worked with the company (signifying loyalty) not based on how much of the product you sold.  Loyalty is definitely the highest virtue here.

For the same project you got an additional bonus for 1) being married or 2) having kids or 3) working long hours.  It is presumed that those who are married or who have kids can't work long hours.  Those without a spouse or kids should be the ones working more as that's their contribution to society.  Once you get married (everyone does) then you will work to have kids (everyone does) and you are monetarily rewarded for it.